
An RBC branch in Ottawa was targeted in an arson Monday. (File photo: Wellesley Consulting Services)
A posting on an indepedent news site with anarchist ties has claimed the fire yesterday at an Ottawa RBC branch was a “direct action” aimed at Canada’s largest bank and one of the main sponsors of the recent 2010 Vancouver Games.
The posting, together with a video, was placed on the Ottawa site for indymedia.org. The website features articles on indiginous rights and sovereignty activities.
The video was posted along with a sequence of stills showing the ATM vestibule at the Bank St and First Ave RBC branch erupting into flames, and a caption “The Vancouver Games are over, but a torch is still burning.”

A fire erupts at an Ottawa RBC branch in an image posted to ottawa.indymedia.org
In February, an RBC branch in Guelph was vandalized by anarchists who claimed responsibility for jamming the keyholes on the doors in a posting on another anarchist blog. Protesters also targeted a Waterloo RBC branch, unfurling a banner with an anti-Olympic message.
In February and again in March of 2008, the same RBC branch at Bank St and First Ave was targeted for vandalism, first when bricks and then a month later when an ice block was thrown through windows, according to a 24 Hours Vancouver report from August that year. The report highlighted several incidents where RBC branches were targeted in vandalism attacks.
In the video posting of the Ottawa RBC branch fire, mention is made of the upcoming G8/G20 summit in Huntsville and Toronto, with the group claiming they “will be there.”
Based in Montreal, RBC has the largest market capitalization of all Canadian banks, at $75.5 billion. Royal Bank employs over 71,000 workers and has nearly 1,200 branches across Canada.
The gold-windowed Toronto offices of the Royal bank are located near the location of the June G20 summit.
Tuesday’s arson attack marks a serious escalation as arson goes well beyond vandalism and has the potential for loss of life.
A strict definition of terrorism under the Criminal Code, if applied to this arson, could be applied rendering the arson an act of terrorism, and the group behind it a terrorist group. The Code defines a terrorist act as including an act that is committed for political or ideological purposes, that is intended to intimidate the public with regard to its security, and that intentionally causes a substantial property damage likely to result in harm.
Applying the definition would then trigger a host of possible crimes related to the provision of materials or financing to the terrorist group, which are indictable offences.